Derasha 11 on Vayikra 1:2

Parashas Vayikra · Aliyah 1 · Passuk 2 · Unit 11 of 15

The Complete Passuk

דַּבֵּ֞ר אֶל־בְּנֵ֤י יִשְׂרָאֵל֙ וְאָמַרְתָּ֣ אֲלֵהֶ֔ם אָדָ֗ם כִּֽי־יַקְרִ֥יב מִכֶּ֛ם קָרְבָּ֖ן לַיהֹוָ֑ה מִן־הַבְּהֵמָ֗ה מִן־הַבָּקָר֙ וּמִן־הַצֹּ֔אן תַּקְרִ֖יבוּ אֶת־קָרְבַּנְכֶֽם׃

Chabad.org — English translation + Rashi

Source Citation

Torah Temimah points to Temurah 28b.

E-Daf.com — Temurah 28b
HebrewBooks / Shas PDF

Core Text of Chazal

Core Text — Temurah 28b
מִן הַבְּהֵמָה — לְהוֹצִיא רוֹבֵעַ וְנִרְבָּע; מִן הַבָּקָר — לְהוֹצִיא אֶת הַנֶּעֱבָד; מִן הַצֹּאן — לְהוֹצִיא אֶת הַמֻּקְצֶה; וּמִן הַצֹּאן — לְהוֹצִיא אֶת הַנּוֹגֵחַ.

English: “From the animal” — to exclude an animal that cohabited or was cohabited with; “from the herd” — to exclude one that was worshiped; “from the flock” — to exclude one set aside (muktzeh) [for idolatry]; and “from the flock” — to exclude a goring animal.

In the sugya: Each species phrase is a separate miyut. The Torah did not need three parallel “from…” clauses merely for style; each carves out a class of animal that is biologically of the right kind but disqualified by history — sexual corruption, idolatrous use, dedication to idolatry, or lethal goring.

Type of Learning

Series of miyutim from the species phrases — form is not enough; history can disqualify.

What Is Learned

These categories are unfit for the altar even though they are animals of the named species: an animal used for bestiality (rovea/nirva), one that was worshiped (ne’evad), one set aside for idolatry (muktzeh), and a goring animal (noggach). The verse’s repeated “from…” is the source of those exclusions.