English: “His offering” — his offering, and not that which was stolen.
In the sugya:Korbano requires a real ownership link between offerer and animal. Even where ye’ush (despair) might transfer civil title in other contexts, the altar still demands that the animal be “his offering” in the sacrificial sense — a gazul does not qualify.
Type of Learning
Miyut from “his offering” — stolen property is out.
What Is Learned
A stolen animal is invalid as a korban. “His offering” is not satisfied by a gazul. This pairs with the earlier mikem exclusion on 1:2: ownership integrity is a standing condition of the nedavah olah.