English: Shmuel said: An olah requires [the owner’s] knowledge/intent, as it is stated “of his free will.”
In the sugya: Shmuel’s formulation shifts from “willingness under pressure” to da’at — informed intent. An olah is not a mechanical deposit; the owner’s knowledge that this is his offering, brought of his will, is part of what lirtzono demands.
Type of Learning
Da’at requirement from lirtzono — informed willingness, not only delivery.
What Is Learned
Bringing an olah requires the owner’s informed willingness, not only mechanical delivery of an animal. Shmuel hangs that requirement on lirtzono: free will implies knowledge and intent, not an unconscious or purely coerced transfer.